Peer Review Policy

Medvix Publications ensures that all manuscripts are evaluated fairly, objectively, and transparently through a rigorous peer review process.

1. Peer Review Process

• All submissions undergo independent peer review appropriate to the journal’s scope.

• Editors select reviewers based on expertise, experience, and absence of conflicts of interest.

2. Reviewer Responsibilities

• Reviewers must provide constructive, unbiased, and timely evaluations.

• All reviews are confidential, and reviewer identities are disclosed only if the journal uses an open review model.

• Reviewers must declare any conflicts of interest that could affect impartiality.

3. Editorial Decision

• Editors make final decisions based on peer review reports, originality, relevance, and ethical compliance.

• Authors receive transparent feedback, including reviewer comments, to support revision or acceptance decisions.

4. Ethical Considerations

• Medvix Publications adheres to COPE guidelines to handle plagiarism, duplicate submission, and other ethical issues.

• Allegations of misconduct are investigated promptly and transparently.

5. Transparency

• Peer review policies and processes are publicly available on the journal website.

• Authors and reviewers are informed about review procedures and expected timelines.